Monthly Archives: June 2011

COT Conference 2011 (#cot2011) – Brighton

COT Conference 2011 (#cot2011) – Brighton

Yes people it’s that time of year again. I went to my first COT annual conference last year and thoroughly enjoyed it. I presented a seminar on CPD and e-portfolios.

This year I am presenting a facilitated poster discussion (session 46) and in a session on creative occupations (session 53) both on elements of my early PhD literature research (I am currently suffering from severe information overload).

For your tweeting pleasure I present below a list of the sessions I am attending.

Day/Time Session No and Title
Wed (10.00-11.00) Opening Plenary – Occupation, evidence and outcomes
Wed (12.45-14.25) Session 7 – Life Stories: use of the Kawa model in a role-emerging setting
Wed (15.00-15.45) Session 35 – Tribalism or collectivism: debating generic vs specialist OT and what this means
Wed (15.40-16.40) Session 46 – My poster discussion – Occupational therapy in practice session
Wed (-18.00) BAOT/COT Annual General Meeting
Wed (18.00-18.45) Twitter Meet up
Thu (8.30-10.00) Session 53 – Creative Occupations (Me)
Thu (10.40-12.20) Session 77- Movies that matter: films as learning activities to engage student’s ethical reflexivity
Thu (12.30-13.30) Kawa Pebble beach meet up
Thu (13.55-15.10) Plenary – Elizabeth Casson Memorial Lecture by Prof Anne Turner
Thu (16.00-16.45) Session 106 – Occupational Therapy Education: an appalling paradox
Thu (16.50-17.35) Session 114 – Responding to reviewer’s comments: the final hurdle of peer review
Fri (9.00-10.40) Session 122 – New Ways of thinking
Fri (11.20-13.00) Session 144 – Occupation and Older People
Fri (13.00-13.40) Final plenary – Occupational Therapy saved my life

Here’s a link to the Conference programme for more information and to the COT’s annual conference page where there is even more detail of the sessions.

Now, I am going to try and live tweet during the sessions that aren’t too interactive and where I’m not presenting but we have a slight problem. The Brighton Centre doesn’t supply free wifi (I was spoilt at the UDMH conference as Bournemouth Uni has free wifi across both campuses) so I won’t be able to use my iPad to tweet (quick and easy) and will instead have to use my phone (currently slowish and with poor battery that gets eaten up by connecting to 3G). Now COT did kindly find out arrangements for purchasing wifi access but the cost is prohibitive as I am pretty sure I’ll need over 4 hours access across the 3 days (£9.99) and 24 hours access is £39.99 – eek. My hotel also has a similar pricing structure so you may have to wait until the evenings for some key points tweets as I did last year with some more substantial blog posts when I get back to wifi.

Now it’s late and I still need to read through my presentation in a dry run and pack.

Please take a look at the sessions I’m attending and if there is anything specific you’d like me to listen out for/ask add a comment below.

Advertisements

#SilentSunday

20110612-122805.jpg

Silent Sunday

Tweeting from #UDMH2011 a CPD opportunity for me and #OT ?

Tweeting from #UDMH2011 a CPD opportunity for me and #OT ?

Today I attended the new University Department of Mental Health’s first conference: ‘Engagement in Life: Promoting Wellbeing in Mental Health’ and I was inspired and frustrated in equal measure. The buzzword used throughout was recovery and it was highlighted that this word often means different things to clinicians and service users. For example with anorexia nervosa, recovery is often measured by clinicians in terms of weight gain, restarting menstruation etc when for a number of service users weight gain has been and is still is associated with failure (see tweets from Ciaran Newell’s session). The service user turned peer support worker who opened discussed a plateau in recovery when without having something to do symptom relief alone is all but meaningless (my analysis). This also links to the ideas of the perils of recovery, something that is often under acknowledged which may lead to lower recovery rates. Now I’m not going to rehash everything that I heard here because I live tweeted during the conference sessions. A lone tweeter on this occasion. I used the hashtag #UDMH2011 so please search out this on twitter or a collation sire such as whatthetrend.

So, what did I find inspiring. Terry Bowyer’s eloquently presented story of his path to recovery and the fact that all of the presenters after him showed that health professionals are finally getting and acting on this message about the importance of working towards what the client sees as important and giving them hope that things will change.

But what was frustrating is that as Occupational Therapists this has been our guiding philosophy for years so why is it not us leading this debate? It was a nursing researcher colleague of mine who has worked with OTs in the past that asked in one of the concurrent sessions can the suggestions from CHIME and REFOCUS (see hashtag timeline for more detail and speaker info) not be mapped to occupational science models. Of course they can. Three elements of the REFOCUS model for example were ‘Understand Value, Assess Strengths and Support Goal Striving’. Immediately I can see that CMOP-E, MOHO, KAWA and the new to me Model of Creative Ability (http://www.otstudent.info/home/models/model-of-creative-ability) would all address this.

Take the CMOP-E (Canadian Model of Occupational Performance and Engagement) for example, which was developed alongside CPPF (Canadian Practice Process Framework) and the CMCE (Canadian Model of Client-Centred Enablement) (Turpin and Iwama, 2011). A client’s spirituality (which includes their values, beliefs, desires etc) is as the centre , the person is assessed in terms of both their deficits and strengths in relation to Affective, Cognitive and Physical Skills (along with their environment and their occupational performance in self-care, productivity and leisure activities. Goal setting is something to be agreed between client and therapist and if using the COPM tool (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure) they re framed under occupational performance headings rather than symptom related ones (Turpin and Iwama, 2011).

So the question remains, why when our theory and philosophy matches current thinking in Mental Health care are we not leading this revolution and how now can we ensure that our role is recognised and valued during the ongoing process of proposed NHS reform. Of course recovery depends on health professionals working together so we need to highlight our profession’s unique role in this process. There are no clear cut answers and I’d be interested to hear your views but here are some of my personal suggestions.
Encourage explicit implementation of occupational therapy models in practice (whichever works best for your setting or indeed each individual client). Share this with your MDT colleagues.
Research, publish and disseminate not only at OT conferences but setting related or medical or at any conferences where we can raise the profile of our profession (I need to take note of this to).
Promote, promote, promote OT, talk about it whenever you have an opportunity to anyone and everyone you meet.

As a lone tweeter did I feel I wasted my time? It’s true I got a little hand cramp and I’m not going to lie it is hard to multitask and I inevitably lost the track of the talks at times. But I have followers who aren’t OTs and hopefully something will have made its way into their consciousness whilst scanning my tweets. After all societal stigma and misunderstanding of mental health conditions is one of the challenges to recovery. But what tweeting did was make me think about what were some of the key messages and summarise these into concise 140 character tweets (minus the characters needed fir #UDMH2011). I can now go back and collect these tweets as a lasting record which is far more legible than my handwriting.

Now as the HPC audit of CPD fast approaches I would like to ask my Twitter/Blog/Facebook followers or friends a favour. If you’re not an OT I hope you didn’t find the influx of messages too annoying, can you tell me if you learnt anything or if anything struck you on reading/scanning the tweets?
If you are an OT, for a CPD activity for your own audit, either having already read the timeline for #UDMH2011 or taking the time to review it now, reflect on what you learnt or picked up that you might be able to implement in your practice, what insight it gave you to making sense of past experiences etc. Please share them with me in the comments in the blog being sure to maintain confidentiality (I moderate comments and will not approve comments that break this so no patient identifiable information). I look forward to seeing some of your responses to the key messages from the sessions I attended.

I will be live and delayed tweeting/blogging from both the College Of Occupational Therapists conference 29th/30th June/1st July and the Occupational Science Conference in Plymouth on 8th/9th September. Before these events I will put up a timetable of the sessions I am attending so you can follow my tweets on those you are interested in.
Sadly the COT session on tweeting was cancelled but if you were planning to attend session 115 and you are interested in meeting up informally please let me know.

Thanks for reading and hopefully reflecting, even if it’s only on one or two points.

Kirsty

Reference
Turpin, M. and Iwama, M. K. 2011. Using Occupational Therapy Models in Practice: a field guide. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone/ Elsevier.

Useful Resources
100 ways to support recovery http://www.mentalhealthshop.org/document.rm?id=8914
REFOCUS project http://www.researchintorecovery.com/refocus/refocusprogramme.html

20110610-235616.jpg

%d bloggers like this: